Buyer Guide

China Sourcing Payment Terms

Deposit structures, L/C and trade assurance.

1. Why it matters

Payment terms are the single largest source of loss in cross-border sourcing. The money you wire before you hold conforming goods is money you can lose to a non-shipment, a quality dispute, or a supplier that quietly becomes insolvent. Good terms are not about paying less — they are about keeping leverage until the goods prove themselves.

Never let the amount paid run ahead of the value you can verify: tie each payment to a milestone you can inspect.

2. The common structures and what each risks

The classic "30% deposit / 70% before shipment" (T/T) is supplier-friendly: by the time you pay the balance you have usually not seen the goods, and once the balance clears the supplier has no reason to fix defects. Shift risk back toward the goods.

StructureBuyer protectionWhen to use
100% before shipment (T/T)Very lowAvoid; only trusted repeat suppliers, small value
30% deposit / 70% against B/L copy after QC passMediumStandard for a vetted supplier
30% / 70% after inspection report, balance to escrowHighNew supplier, larger value
Irrevocable L/C at sightHigh (bank-mediated)Large orders, both sides bankable

3. Verify the payee before the first wire

The most preventable loss is paying the wrong account. The beneficiary name on the proforma invoice must match the licensed company you verified, and the bank must be onshore in the same jurisdiction. A sudden request to pay a Hong Kong personal account, a "finance partner", or a changed account mid-order is the classic fraud pattern — stop and re-confirm by phone with a known contact.

  • Beneficiary name == verified business license entity (exact match).
  • Bank onshore in the supplier's jurisdiction, not a third-country personal account.
  • Treat any mid-order account change as fraud until re-verified out-of-band.
  • Keep the signed PI/contract, bank slip and invoice as one matched set.

4. Retention, escrow and the balance lever

Keep a lever after delivery. A 5-10% quality-retention held for 30-60 days after receipt, or the balance released only against a passed third-party inspection, gives the supplier a concrete reason to accept re-work. Platform escrow (Alibaba Trade Assurance and similar) can substitute when you cannot negotiate retention, but read what the escrow actually covers — most cover non-shipment and gross non-conformance, not subtle spec drift.

5. Checklist

  • Match beneficiary name exactly to the verified license before wiring
  • Tie the balance to a passed pre-shipment inspection, not to the ship date
  • Negotiate a 5-10% quality retention held 30-60 days
  • Re-confirm any account change by phone with a known contact
  • Use L/C or escrow for large or first-time orders

6. FAQ

Is Alibaba Trade Assurance enough protection?
It covers non-shipment and clear quality breaches against the agreed order terms, which is real protection for small orders. But the payout depends on the order contract you set up on the platform — vague specs give you a weak claim. For large value, add a third-party inspection clause and consider an L/C.
The supplier refuses any retention — walk away?
Not necessarily, but rebalance elsewhere: shift the balance to release only against a passed inspection, shorten the deposit, or use escrow. A supplier who refuses every risk-sharing mechanism on a new relationship is telling you something.

Continue reading

Publish an RFQ Compare products